Okay not my best back to back test but I was suppose to be somewhere else today so the results are what I got with no changes to the tune.
94 Mustang GT
ProCharger D1@20psi
Snow Performance Boost Cooler Stage 3 with 50/50 Water/Methanol
TFS 185 CNC
Camshaft: Frezzy74
Edelbrock RPMII
80lbs injectors
Old exhaust setup
MAC 1 3/4" Shorty
MAC 2.5" H-pipe
MAc 2.5" tailpipe w/Magnaflow mufflers (2.5")
New exhaust setup (til saturday)
MAC 1 3/4" Shorty
MAC 3" ProChamber
MAC 3" catback w/MAC Flowpath mufflers (3")
Pic of my engine bay
Tuning stuff
More tuning stuff (on the floor)
Trunk
Dyno sheet
As you can see we let off at 5700rpms (Oops) but the peak numbers were as follows:
760rwhp vs 786rwhp SAE (granted not at same rpm) but a gain of 26rwhp for peak to peak comparison.
@4000 rpms: 430rwhp vs 436rwhp
@5000 rpms: 649rwhp vs 660rwhp
@5500 rpms: 719rwhp vs 750rwhp
@5700 rpms: 741rwhp vs 786rwhp
Mufflers are going to be swapped out for 3" Magnaflows this saturday and then its back on the dyno.
Long Tube Headers: I have personal reasons why I'm not using long tube headers and I do know they will make more power but its for personal reasons why I chose not to use them.
Thanks
Michael Plummer
1994 Yellow Mustang GT
839rwhp and 770rwtq SAE
Proud Member of:
SmokinStangs.com-- www.smokinstangs.com
Dude, what a freakin graph!!!! Impressive......
Curiuos, what personal reasons do you have against long tubes? I can totally understand if its the installation thing, they are a *****!
--- Ian ---
2003 SVT Cobra 10th Anniversary Edition -- The Show Car
1989 LX Vert -- The Cruiser -Sold But Never Forgotten
07 Jeep Patriot -- The Daily
The worst part of the installation is disconnecting/reconnecting the EGR tube on the passenger header. Other than that, it's as easy as unhooking the steering shaft, removing the two 23mm nuts from the motor mounts, jacking up the engine about 42ft. (yes I meant 42) and wiggling them into place. I do realize it's not that simple on everyones 94/95 car but it is straightforward.Originally Posted by TorchRedSVT
Michael........You really should get that "personal reason" checked out by a professional; it's just not good for your health being that close to 800rwhp knowing that you can get past it but not doing it.
Last edited by Cobraman1024; 10-31-2011 at 12:20 PM.
I installed the long tube headers. Not fun to do it, but I noticed a small hp gain. Sound I have to say is better.
Getting closer and going to do it with shorty headers: http://forums.corral.net/forums/supe...tout-sort.htmlThe worst part of the installation is disconnecting/reconnecting the EGR tube on the passenger header. Other than that, it's as easy as unhooking the steering shaft, removing the two 23mm nuts from the motor mounts, jacking up the engine about 42ft. (yes I meant 42) and wiggling them into place. I do realize it's not that simple on everyones 94/95 car but it is straightforward.
Michael........You really should get that "personal reason" checked out by a professional; it's just not good for your health being that close to 800rwhp knowing that you can get past it but not doing it.
1994 Yellow Mustang GT
839rwhp and 770rwtq SAE
Proud Member of:
SmokinStangs.com-- www.smokinstangs.com
WHAT?!?!?! Michael, you only need another 3/4 rwhp? Hell, wait a couple of weeks for it to get colder and you should have that! WOW!!!
Last edited by ToplessPony94; 11-01-2011 at 06:40 PM.
Bruce (aka: "Stealth Fighter Pilot") www.ProjectFallenHero.com
TFS TW heads, rockers, 75mm intake, cam, timing chain/gears, 75mm TB, CAI, MAF, 30# injectors, Aeromotive rails/regulator, 255 pump, Fluidyne radiator, alum water pump, MSD 6A/coil, FR 9mm wires, alum flywheel, PP, driveshaft, McLeod clutch, Torsen T2R, 3.73, 31spline axles, 17" 95 Cobra R, NT-05 255/275, MM CC plates, coil-over (F&R Bilstein), rlca, K-brace, SF conns, Cobra brakes, =len shorties, 2.5" SS Hpipe, Borla CB, Bi-Xenon...
awsome.... so close to my build in design
2012 Boss mustang, UPR upper/ lowers, JLT CAI, flowmaster axle backs tuned by DEZ RACING , billet grill, LS spoiler, 302s HOOD',1/4 window louvers, track key401RWHP11.9
1994 Mustang (PROJECT) 347 stroker, 4 bolt main SVO block, windsor senior cast iron heads, Forged motor built and assembled by DEZ RACING, F1C PROCHARGER Full UPR suspension, smoothed front inner fenders, expecting 750 RWHP on pump gas
People keep saying that but checkout the following:
Feb 2011: 786rwhp SAE
July 2011: 785rwhp SAE
Sept 2011: 787rwhp SAE
We installed a larger intake and picked up some HP but ran into other issues but we made the following: 799rwhp SAE
So when I use the SAE correction factor it doesn't matter what time of year it is because we still made the same. Now UnCORRECTED RWHP numbers where vastly different on those dates above where the colder temps the UnCORRECTED numbers were higher than the warmer months.
My failed attempts: http://forums.corral.net/forums/supe...tout-sort.html
1994 Yellow Mustang GT
839rwhp and 770rwtq SAE
Proud Member of:
SmokinStangs.com-- www.smokinstangs.com
Interesting data. At 799 you could for conversation round it up to 800 and we will all be ok with it!!
Why do I have a feeling you have a log of many, many test/tune combination's on your 94 from over the years....
As an accomplishment 799 is pretty SMOKIN...
SmokinStangs.com......A Premiere Mustang Enthusiast Community-Based Forum.
"Bringing Mustang Enthusiasts together like never seen before!"
SmokinStangs.com-- www.SmokinStangs.com
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks